XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 12, 2017 16:50:06 GMT 1
78X would be incorrect as well. It's either B78X (ICAO) or 78J (IATA).
|
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 12, 2017 17:04:41 GMT 1
78X would be incorrect as well. It's either B78X (ICAO) or 78J (IATA). Can't understand why ICAO and IATA won't align on this ..... Really annoying and confusing .... |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 13, 2017 5:08:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 13, 2017 17:39:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 13, 2017 19:36:42 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 14, 2017 13:57:39 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by pa380scal on Nov 14, 2017 16:35:14 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Nov 15, 2017 2:27:34 GMT 1
Probably not Emirates but this massive A320 order for Indigo Partners (Which includes airlines such as Frontier and is not connected to India's Indigo). If the numbers are correct (and even if half of that number are options), it'll be an amazing rabbit that John Leahy has been able to pull out of his magicial hat. |
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Nov 15, 2017 5:02:10 GMT 1
This is a jaw-dropping number. Would be a great Air SHow for Airbus if true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Nov 15, 2017 8:14:02 GMT 1
Indigo partners order has been confirmed
|
|
