|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 15, 2019 23:40:49 GMT 1
video for internal memo from Dickson
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 17, 2019 18:13:42 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 17, 2019 20:16:04 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 20, 2019 9:29:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by fanairbus on Nov 20, 2019 11:47:49 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Nov 20, 2019 14:22:24 GMT 1
I'd say some Q1 permit to return to service is possible if they don't fail the testing now.
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 22, 2019 22:55:59 GMT 1
some new twist from Canada
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 23, 2019 1:41:13 GMT 1
TAC's report contains actual email
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 23, 2019 9:40:46 GMT 1
I find this opinion extremely surprising. We have been told that the only reason Boeing introduced the MCAS is the type could not be certified without it. Now, an official suggests, without any reference to the aircraft behavior, that nothing at all should have been done ...
Perhaps he would change his mind after a test flight sans MCAS, as requested by EASA !
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Nov 24, 2019 8:03:11 GMT 1
|
|