|
Post by ff on Dec 25, 2019 21:26:11 GMT 1
Most likely LN898, Suparna Airlines.
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Jan 24, 2020 19:08:44 GMT 1
hardly a surprise
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,230
|
Post by someone on Jan 29, 2020 14:20:50 GMT 1
Official from Boeing: Production to be reduced to 10 per month within 2021
|
|
|
Post by fanairbus on Jan 29, 2020 18:45:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Jan 29, 2020 18:53:32 GMT 1
I would suspect they would go ahead with the cut mostly from Charleston then. The Renton plant already took a hit with the 737 Max grounding situation and a cut at Everett will drive Washington state nuts.
What's interesting is that in the flightglobal article even mentions the coronavirus situation which has NOTHING to do with the Dreamliner rates cut in 2021 lol.
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jan 29, 2020 23:10:46 GMT 1
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 1, 2020 9:24:14 GMT 1
The above is another misinformed comment : the 787 deferred production costs and programme break even are only loosely related ! Boeing has obviously been booking profits from the 787 programme for several years, so that programme break even should happen well before the deferred costs have ben cleared, though only Boeing has an idea of the timeline.
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Feb 2, 2020 7:21:08 GMT 1
The above is another misinformed comment : the 787 deferred production costs and programme break even are only loosely related ! Boeing has obviously been booking profits from the 787 programme for several years, so that programme break even should happen well before the deferred costs have ben cleared, though only Boeing has an idea of the timeline. Not exactly.... Unless you are telling me Boeing has been booked 18.7B revenue from 787, the program is not break even yet .....
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,502
|
Post by sciing on Feb 2, 2020 16:02:51 GMT 1
The above is another misinformed comment : the 787 deferred production costs and programme break even are only loosely related ! Boeing has obviously been booking profits from the 787 programme for several years, so that programme break even should happen well before the deferred costs have ben cleared, though only Boeing has an idea of the timeline. Not exactly.... Unless you are telling me Boeing has been booked 18.7B revenue from 787, the program is not break even yet ..... Revenue is much higher, there are almost 950 deliveries. So the revenue is far above 100B. If you calculate with a profit frame of 30mill $, there is profit of 30B. This profit is the difference between average selling price and the calculated cost per frame taken for program accounting. For break even this number needs than higher than deferred cost block and the development cost.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Feb 2, 2020 16:20:41 GMT 1
Not exactly.... Unless you are telling me Boeing has been booked 18.7B revenue from 787, the program is not break even yet ..... Revenue is much higher, there are almost 950 deliveries. So the revenue is far above 100B. If calculate a profit frame of 30mill $, there is profit of 30B. This profit is the difference between average selling price and the calculated cost per frame taken for program accounting. For break even this number needs than higher than deferred cost block and the development cost. $105m per frame seems a bit cheap ? Unless that's without engines ?
|
|