XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 12, 2016 12:09:44 GMT 1
P&W A321neo is scheduled to fly next month.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 12, 2016 13:37:59 GMT 1
The CFM A321neo is broken.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Feb 12, 2016 14:12:32 GMT 1
That's a bit unfortunate I wonder if it was during landing or takeoff ?
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 13, 2016 9:29:18 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by limoncello on Feb 13, 2016 12:23:02 GMT 1
Another video about the first flight and returns and landing back in XFW.
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Feb 13, 2016 18:17:11 GMT 1
That's a bit unfortunate I wonder if it was during landing or takeoff ? Landing per
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Feb 13, 2016 18:19:14 GMT 1
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959
|
Post by s543 on Feb 13, 2016 19:00:43 GMT 1
If the reason is as described the Korean incident in the link above - it is strange that such a thing could happen to super experienced test pilots ?
It should not be too complicated to fix.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Feb 13, 2016 19:26:28 GMT 1
If the reason is as described the Korean incident in the link above - it is strange that such a thing could happen to super experienced test pilots ? It should not be too complicated to fix. Mistakes do happen, I guess the aircraft needs an internal structural examination to make sure no serious damage has been done ?
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 14, 2016 10:46:32 GMT 1
If the reason is as described the Korean incident in the link above - it is strange that such a thing could happen to super experienced test pilots ? It should not be too complicated to fix. We don't know whether the incident happened during some test. I however doubt this could have been a vmu test : it happens too early in the test programme, the airport would not be a location of choice for such a test, and if it had been the case, the aircraft would have been fitted with a tailskid.
|
|