XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 7, 2015 8:37:30 GMT 1
A351 is wrong, IMO we should stick with the official IATA codes. The whole world will use A35K and so should we. Setting A350-1000 might be a little long so I've tried just with the A351 The full name (A350-1000) would even be better. Perhaps we can try that as well? |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Oct 7, 2015 13:01:15 GMT 1
To sum up, we can use full names (A350-900, A350-1000) or IATA codes (A359, A35K).
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,333
|
Post by someone on Oct 7, 2015 13:05:20 GMT 1
To sum up, we can use full names (A350-900, A350-1000) or IATA codes (A359, A35K). Nitpicking, but A359 is an ICAO code. IATA is 359  |
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Oct 7, 2015 13:32:58 GMT 1
To sum up, we can use full names (A350-900, A350-1000) or IATA codes (A359, A35K). Full names for me please it easier ! PS it's also easier for the non technical users / visitors to the board, as that is what they will know them as. |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Oct 7, 2015 20:42:07 GMT 1
Like this  |
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Oct 7, 2015 22:02:41 GMT 1
Like this That's how they should look, we are not using Twitter  |
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 8, 2015 8:26:13 GMT 1
Much better and not too long at all. Perfect |
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 19, 2015 16:20:21 GMT 1
Per a.net:
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxx on Oct 21, 2015 18:57:20 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Nov 4, 2015 13:29:40 GMT 1
|
|
Setting A350-1000 might be a little long so I've tried just with the A351
