mtrunz
delivered!
Digital Aviation/Meteo Analyst
Posts: 1,955 
|
Post by mtrunz on Nov 18, 2016 14:23:03 GMT 1
|
|
spotterxfw
in service - 2 years
Hometown XFW
Posts: 3,901
|
Post by spotterxfw on Nov 19, 2016 11:36:31 GMT 1
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,329
|
Post by someone on Nov 22, 2016 9:57:10 GMT 1
Which is the 2nd? 7277 or 7341? Never mind, just answered my own question! A320-251N, SAS, F-WWDH, LN-RGM, (MSN 7277) NEO F1 and ferried TLS-XFW: 14 Nov. 2016 (Call Sign AIB01DH, Hex:3810DA) time: 15:44-19:20 Ferried back to TLS yesterday, after one week for outfitting at XFW. So some test flights/CAF remains before delivery |
|
|
|
Post by pa380scal on Nov 23, 2016 16:43:41 GMT 1
12l/per passenger for a ~550km flight (about 2.2l/per passenger for 100km):
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Nov 23, 2016 17:43:17 GMT 1
12l/per passenger for a ~550km flight (about 2.2l/per passenger for 100km): Amazing how efficient air transport has become. Depending on the number passengers traveling, it could be at least as efficient as a small family car. |
|
burns
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
A321 NEO !!!
Posts: 82
|
Post by burns on Nov 23, 2016 17:52:15 GMT 1
Interesting, that some still says, that there is more potential in the engine
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 23, 2016 18:12:24 GMT 1
Yet, the Copenhagen - Stockholm route is much shorter than what the A320-neo is optimised for. I would like to see the numbers for a 3000 Km route.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 24, 2016 9:58:28 GMT 1
Unfortunately we have no direct comparison to the A320ceo, or the P&W powered A320neo. Therefore I do not know if those figures are good or not.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 27, 2016 18:25:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 28, 2016 9:37:15 GMT 1
|
|
