SAS380
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
Posts: 92
|
Post by SAS380 on Jan 16, 2017 9:24:58 GMT 1
Hi someone,
Have they changed the registrations for the A320neos
from LN- to SE-.
Do you have a source.
Regards,
SAS380
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,335
Member is Online
|
Post by someone on Jan 16, 2017 9:55:36 GMT 1
Hi someone, Have they changed the registrations for the A320neos from LN- to SE-. Do you have a source. Regards, SAS380 Not public......  But on the front wheel for on MSN7489, it should be written DOX |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 19, 2017 18:33:45 GMT 1
Any way the SAS A320neos would appear in a certain way on flysas.com?...
It seems the website mentions 2 different kinds of A320s, 'A320' and 'A320 Sharklets', an A320 Sharklets would necessarily be an A320neo?..
On another website those A320 Sharklets are also mentionned 'A32A'..
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,335
Member is Online
|
Post by someone on Jan 19, 2017 22:48:09 GMT 1
Any way the SAS A320neos would appear in a certain way on flysas.com?... It seems the website mentions 2 different kinds of A320s, 'A320' and 'A320 Sharklets', an A320 Sharklets would necessarily be an A320neo?.. On another website those A320 Sharklets are also mentionned 'A32A'.. On SAS website (booking engine) the NEO is listed as A320 Sharklets Btw: None of SAS A320ceos has sharklets |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 20, 2017 4:39:14 GMT 1
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,335
Member is Online
|
Post by someone on Jan 21, 2017 9:27:23 GMT 1
MSN7489 is still stored at TLS without engines, so a January delivery as scheduled gets less likely for each day. Seems like CFMs minor delay in Leap deliveries is the cause
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Jan 21, 2017 10:45:01 GMT 1
MSN7489 is still stored at TLS without engines, so a January delivery as scheduled gets less likely for each day. Seems like CFMs minor delay in Leap deliveries is the cause If you call it minor. The shortfall is 23 engines that means 11 frames. |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503 
|
Post by sciing on Jan 21, 2017 12:27:51 GMT 1
MSN7489 is still stored at TLS without engines, so a January delivery as scheduled gets less likely for each day. Seems like CFMs minor delay in Leap deliveries is the cause If you call it minor. The shortfall is 23 engines that means 11 frames. Which 11 should this be? If you read again the much to short and insufficient Twitter post it looks more like that this was not really a engine shortfall but shortfall of frames due planning issues. |
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Jan 21, 2017 17:08:46 GMT 1
If you call it minor. The shortfall is 23 engines that means 11 frames. Which 11 should this be? If you read again the much to short and insufficient Twitter post it looks more like that this was not really a engine shortfall but shortfall of frames due planning issues. That Twitter post was a good joke. Airbus got fewer LEAP engines in 2016 than expected and delivered about 10 neos with LEAP engines fewer than planed. SAS for example is waiting for birds. What change of plan should have stopped Airbus from getting its needed LEAP engines? The only change I have heard off, is Boeing accelerating the EIS of the 737-8MAX this year, but that is still a few month away. What planing mistake by Airbus should have delayed the engine deliveries, did they promise frames to customers without telling CFM that they needed engines? I talked in the end of last year about problems with the LEAP engine supply to Airbus. Airbus has slowed production of the neo and accelerated ceo production to make up numbers. The deliveries of A320 neo with LEAP engines is as slow as the deliveries with GTF and Airbus has slightly more birds with LEAP on order than with GTF. Frames with both engine versions should now starting with MSN7500 numbers if everything would have gone according to plan. |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503
|
Post by sciing on Jan 21, 2017 19:10:46 GMT 1
There are not 11 LEAP frames undelivered below 7500. There were not 11 frames waiting for engines in 2016.
In don't give a damn to this tweet. But if you use it to say 23 are missing, than please full version.
The real discussion point is: "The LEAP is as slow as GTF"! I challenge because it does not fit to facts.
No LEAP (beside the 2 test frames and special issue 7181) below MSN 7450 is undelivered.
There are many GTFs non Qatar with73xx are still undelivered.
So this statement is based on what?
|
|
