|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 5, 2016 7:25:43 GMT 1
Nice picture!
Although it doesn't mention 'Roll Out', it looks like being rolled out... (12 weeks). What would have then happened to MSN234 now at 18 weeks since arrival?.....
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 7, 2016 18:23:59 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 8, 2016 1:18:18 GMT 1
13 weeks!  |
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 8, 2016 2:27:30 GMT 1
13 weeks! I still think the roll out date should be the 4th not the 7th, nothing change from the picture in the 4th. I believe our friend A380_TLS_A350 just forgot to write roll out that date and he did this time |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 8, 2016 3:02:45 GMT 1
In fact I noticed a few differences along the fuselage, all the tape around the windows is gone on the 2nd picture.... maybe the second date would be more appropriate?..... |
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 8, 2016 3:06:12 GMT 1
If it didn't go to the hangar then roll out is Friday but unfortunately we may not know. I am OK with any maybe to be consistent to choose today date
Sent from my SM-G850W using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 8, 2016 3:41:08 GMT 1
I think though usually you are right addasih, the first time we are used to seeing a frame with engines on the FL, at both TLS and XFW, we are used to considering it rolled out, even if it goes later on to a hangar for some finishing work..... so following this we should use the first date....(?)......
|
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 8, 2016 3:43:52 GMT 1
I am OK either way, what other members think?
|
|
|
|
Post by ff on Nov 9, 2016 5:40:05 GMT 1
Let's respect the author of the photos. I don't think he "forgot" to mention roll out in his first photo, so 7th Nov should be treated as roll out date, as he marked on the photo.
|
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 19, 2016 20:48:38 GMT 1
|
|
