Festus
Final Assembly Line stage 1
Posts: 272
|
Post by Festus on Aug 6, 2013 17:33:08 GMT 1
Is it common to use the outer engines only for taxiing?
|
|
|
Post by bmw801 on Aug 12, 2013 10:34:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by bmw801 on Aug 12, 2013 10:42:27 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by peter on Aug 12, 2013 16:14:03 GMT 1
On the side it says A4M009, is that considered to be the test registration?
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Oct 22, 2013 18:43:37 GMT 1
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Oct 22, 2013 23:05:06 GMT 1
The link leads me to (interesting) information about the new C295 firefighting version, not about the A400 M.
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Oct 23, 2013 2:31:02 GMT 1
The link leads me to (interesting) information about the new C295 firefighting version, not about the A400 M. It seems Airbus somehow changed the URL. i updated my post with the new link
|
|
tamzeed
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
Posts: 94
|
Post by tamzeed on Oct 24, 2013 11:36:12 GMT 1
Looks like cn002 is about to land after doing some North-South runs west of TLS.
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Oct 24, 2013 21:44:42 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by julytourist on Jan 16, 2014 16:39:59 GMT 1
F-WWMZ and EC-402 are both doing test flights at the moment. F-WWMZ's position on Flightradar's Google maps looks accurate in that it took off from the Tlse runway..... But EC-402's positioning is way off. Earlier it was doing 'circles and bumps' in a field way to the north west of the runway on the other side of the Elbe!. I know older planes (757 for example) use less accurate technology (many land several miles north/south of LHR!) but you would expect two A400's to present the same accuracy. Any ideas anyone? (3.40pm 16/1) JT
|
|