XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 30, 2016 15:51:55 GMT 1
| A350-1000 | MSN102 Qatar Airway #2 | | Test registration | F-WZFY | | Registration | A7-ANB | | Roll Out (TLS) | May 2, 2018 | | First flight | May 18, 2018 (AIB01FY) - (#6 to fly) | | Flight Test | May 31, 2018 (AIB02FY) | | Flight Test | June 15, 2018 (AIB03FY) | | Flight Test | June 19, 2018 (AIB04FY) | | CAF | June 25, 2018 (AIB05FY) | | CAF | June 27, 2018 (AIB06FY) | | CAF | June 29, 2018 (AIB07FY) | | Delivered | June 30, 2018 | | Delivery flight | June 30, 2018 (#3 delivered) - QTR3350 TLS-DOH |
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 30, 2016 15:53:07 GMT 1
The second A350-1000 production frame is currently undergoing fuselage join at Station 50.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jan 6, 2017 22:11:15 GMT 1
Currently at Station 30.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 2, 2017 13:02:56 GMT 1
Out of assembly, parked at P18 currently.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 2, 2017 13:44:21 GMT 1
I wonder whether we should keep the same sequence for an airline's A359s and A35Ks. The alternative would be to use two different sequences. We could use an unchanged sequence for QR A359s (QR 1, 2 ...), and a new one for their A35Ks (for instance, QR 1K, QR 2K ... Or QR 1001, QR 1002 ...). What do you think ?
|
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Feb 2, 2017 14:13:09 GMT 1
I wonder whether we should keep the same sequence for an airline's A359s and A35Ks. The alternative would be to use two different sequences. We could use an unchanged sequence for QR A359s (QR 1, 2 ...), and a new one for their A35Ks (for instance, QR 1K, QR 2K ... Or QR 1001, QR 1002 ...). What do you think ? How about not putting the (QR23) bit (for example) in the thread title when it's created. But only add it when it is delivered ? The thread title is already unique as it contains the MSN ! Then we can keep one sequence per airline ! |
|
|
|
Post by a380admirer on Feb 2, 2017 14:16:44 GMT 1
I wonder whether we should keep the same sequence for an airline's A359s and A35Ks. The alternative would be to use two different sequences. We could use an unchanged sequence for QR A359s (QR 1, 2 ...), and a new one for their A35Ks (for instance, QR 1K, QR 2K ... Or QR 1001, QR 1002 ...). What do you think ? From my point of view: Two different sequence is better. QR 1001, QR 1002 and so on, looks fine because is the right name for a great plane  |
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 6, 2017 21:29:25 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Mar 8, 2017 17:13:09 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Mar 8, 2017 19:54:52 GMT 1
Storage state too.......... will we ever see any -1000 delivered this year??.....  |
|
