|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Apr 21, 2018 22:47:00 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Aug 3, 2018 18:43:24 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Aug 4, 2018 7:55:14 GMT 1
It was expected, in storage too......................  What is the plane on the right, with a '264'?..... |
|
|
|
Post by peter on Aug 4, 2018 10:00:34 GMT 1
What is the plane on the right, with a '264'?..... Finnair A350 |
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Sept 28, 2018 23:38:42 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Sept 29, 2018 8:28:13 GMT 1
?!this is soo surprising, why pull a frame that is already in storage,
against rolling out some frames that are ~not known in storage~ though long overdue?.....
MSN259EK 21 weeks since arrival,
MSN263NH 14 weeks since arrival,......
(and why did they put that frame in storage state just for 2 months?.....)........
Anyways,
45 weeks for roll out for MSN256 since arrival.
|
|
|
|
Post by a380admirer on Oct 1, 2018 7:14:11 GMT 1
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Oct 1, 2018 9:11:03 GMT 1
?!this is soo surprising, why pull a frame that is already in storage, against rolling out some frames that are ~not known in storage~ though long overdue?..... We see that frames are put in storage, sit there for a while, then get delivered while others are stored. Remember that when all this was introduced, the release did not announce deferments from to 2017 to 2019, it actually announced that some frames (six ? I am not sure now) would be delayed from 2017 to 2018, others from 2018 to 2019. So, the rollover of frames in storage is pretty well organised. |
|
|
|
Post by peter on Oct 16, 2018 15:24:43 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Oct 16, 2018 19:05:56 GMT 1
|
|
