mtrunz
delivered!
Digital Aviation/Meteo Analyst
Posts: 1,956 
|
Post by mtrunz on Aug 9, 2018 19:23:07 GMT 1
Might have just been certain weather conditions. I believe on one of the diversion days the plane was taxing for almost an hour or so at the departure airport. That can contribute to it as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by andremp on Aug 9, 2018 22:36:14 GMT 1
Also I don't believe that those 321neos have the extra ACT's, which makes quite difference on those routes.
|
|
shpeex
spotted unpainted on the Flight Line (waiting for painting)
Posts: 1,141
|
Post by shpeex on Aug 13, 2018 7:32:30 GMT 1
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,333
|
Post by someone on Aug 13, 2018 8:20:58 GMT 1
For some reason OY-PAB/MSN8195 which should have been their second, has been overtaken by aircraft with higher MSNs. Anyone know why or know its status?
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Aug 13, 2018 10:25:31 GMT 1
In the first post is a mix up between A320neo and A321neo. Over the list of frames stands A320neo and I think all 6 frames are A321, as also the name of the thread.
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Aug 13, 2018 10:51:49 GMT 1
In the first post is a mix up between A320neo and A321neo. Over the list of frames stands A320neo and I think all 6 frames are A321, as also the name of the thread. If I'm not wrong, the full list are A321neos, with the last two being NX (ACF version), so maybe what it is just wrong is the subheader on the first post saying A320neos |
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Aug 14, 2018 3:53:45 GMT 1
First post fixed.  |
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Aug 14, 2018 7:23:21 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Aug 14, 2018 7:45:17 GMT 1
|
|
mtrunz
delivered!
Digital Aviation/Meteo Analyst
Posts: 1,956
|
Post by mtrunz on Aug 28, 2018 18:45:57 GMT 1
|
|
