|
|
Post by Ravi1925 on Jan 2, 2020 10:22:58 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Jan 15, 2020 19:29:36 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Ravi1925 on Jan 20, 2020 18:04:58 GMT 1
|
|
kronus
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,403 
|
Post by kronus on Jan 23, 2020 14:01:08 GMT 1
Current status of jetblue a321 order: page 2
page 13 and 23
Only 11 deliveries in 2020, 7 deliveries from 2019 and 3 from 2020 deferred because a321neo production delays. |
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jan 23, 2020 22:00:10 GMT 1
hmm 7+3=10 not 11
|
|
kronus
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,403
|
Post by kronus on Jan 24, 2020 11:12:39 GMT 1
10 deliveries earlier planned for 2019 and 2020 will be delivered in 2021 or later. 11 deliveries in 2020 instead earlier planned 14. |
|
kronus
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,403
|
Post by kronus on Jan 27, 2020 14:30:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by marlibu on Jan 27, 2020 17:16:51 GMT 1
Who actually pays for these leases? Is it Airbus? Tobeblack and white, the delays are coming from Airbus(vendor),so why should the customer pay for any interim solutions to keep their business going?? But as with most things in reality...its never usually that simple.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jan 28, 2020 12:33:53 GMT 1
Who actually pays for these leases? Is it Airbus? Tobeblack and white, the delays are coming from Airbus(vendor),so why should the customer pay for any interim solutions to keep their business going?? But as with most things in reality...its never usually that simple. When the customer has taken delivery (i.e. the operator has paid to purchase the aircraft, or is making payments to a lessor) and cannot use it (as is the case presently for the MAXes), then the manufacturer may have to pay for interim lift. In this case, however, it's just a delivery delay and the customer is entitled to a much smaller compensation set by the sales contract. |
|
|
|
Post by marlibu on Jan 28, 2020 16:32:18 GMT 1
|
|
