|
Post by Shadow123 on Jan 22, 2019 14:12:37 GMT 1
|
|
yumi
spotted unpainted on the Flight Line (waiting for painting)
Posts: 1,102
|
Post by yumi on Jan 22, 2019 14:57:23 GMT 1
|
|
K
spotted unpainted on the Flight Line (waiting for painting)
Posts: 1,130
|
Post by K on Jan 22, 2019 15:45:09 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jan 22, 2019 19:17:08 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jan 23, 2019 1:32:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jan 23, 2019 22:10:36 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Jan 24, 2019 14:57:55 GMT 1
One question with regards to MSN245 and MSN226, the number in the title is supposed to be based on the contractual delivery or on the delivery flight? In the first case, both planes are OK, but if it is the 2nd case, we will have to change HU#3 for HU#4 and viceversa
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jan 24, 2019 15:52:47 GMT 1
One question with regards to MSN245 and MSN226, the number in the title is supposed to be based on the contractual delivery or on the delivery flight? This forum is using official delivery dates per Airbus' spreadsheets (= contractual deliveries). Our threads are updated by Addasih after Airbus' monthly releases.
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Jan 24, 2019 16:30:06 GMT 1
This forum is using official delivery dates per Airbus' spreadsheets (= contractual deliveries). Our threads are updated by Addasih after Airbus' monthly releases. Perfect, it was just to confirm that we were doing that
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Jan 24, 2019 18:17:56 GMT 1
One question with regards to MSN245 and MSN226, the number in the title is supposed to be based on the contractual delivery or on the delivery flight? This forum is using official delivery dates per Airbus' spreadsheets (= contractual deliveries). Our threads are updated by Addasih after Airbus' monthly releases. But the problem is the contractual delivery of this frame was to LATAM group. If we count JJ frame number we should use the contractual delivery date sequence to determine which is #3 and which is #4. But the leases to HU didn't start until this year and HU did get their hand on MSN 245 first and then MSN 226. So shouldn't MSN 245 be #3 in this case? Just a personal confusion though. 😊
|
|