|
|
Post by peter on Aug 31, 2018 16:10:27 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Nov 10, 2018 18:20:11 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Nov 11, 2018 0:13:24 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913 
|
Post by backstroke on Nov 20, 2018 10:07:09 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Nov 22, 2018 11:14:53 GMT 1
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Nov 22, 2018 11:31:54 GMT 1
the oldest of the old gliders |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503
|
Post by sciing on Nov 22, 2018 11:54:56 GMT 1
the oldest of the old gliders This one was never a glider, Frontier did not want to take it up after the explosion of an hydraulic system. The engines were taken off after that decision, but the frame was never seen stored without engines before. |
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Nov 22, 2018 12:04:07 GMT 1
the oldest of the old gliders This one was never a glider, Frontier did not want to take it up after the explosion of an hydraulic system. The engines were taken off after that decision, but the frame was never seen stored without engines before. of course it was stored without engines and there are pictures both still in Frontier colours and than in storage paint You will also find a picture in this thread. |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503
|
Post by sciing on Nov 22, 2018 13:00:35 GMT 1
This one was never a glider, Frontier did not want to take it up after the explosion of an hydraulic system. The engines were taken off after that decision, but the frame was never seen stored without engines before. of course it was stored without engines and there are pictures both still in Frontier colours and than in storage paint You will also find a picture in this thread. I have written BEFORE the NTU decision, I said the engines were taken off afterwards, so what do you want to show me? If you want disagree maybe you challenge at least a point I have written. |
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Nov 22, 2018 13:33:26 GMT 1
I have written BEFORE the NTU decision, I said the engines were taken off afterwards, so what do you want to show me? If you want disagree maybe you challenge at least a point I have written. You said that MSN7181 was never a glider. That is totally nonsense. I am talking about the frame. It does not matter who it was supposed to go to. It was stored over a year as an engine less glider after Frontier rejected it standing around in primer and no work done for a whole long time. The engines were taken off in January 2019 and it got engines again sometime this summer. The word glider has been used on this forum for frames stored a long time without engines. If you want to make this a special case not having been a glider, why, because the repairs did take so long? Can you prove that that frame would not have been repaired faster and delivered faster if enough engines would have been available? And I do know the history of that frame as well as you. And I assume that they engines taken off it were used to deliver another frame. |
|
SlamAir A320-251N msn 7181 by dn280tls, on Flickr
