|
Post by fanairbus on Apr 2, 2019 21:06:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Apr 3, 2019 6:41:41 GMT 1
wow .... so ET crew follow the SB Boeing released after JT610 and still .....
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Apr 3, 2019 10:43:57 GMT 1
wow .... so ET crew follow the SB Boeing released after JT610 and still ..... From the first page of the newspaper European edition : "Pilots at the controls of the Boeing 737 MAX that crashed in March in Ethiopia initially followed emergency procedures laid out by the plane maker but still failed to recover control of the jet". www.wsj.com/europeThis story is getting worse and worse ...
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Apr 3, 2019 13:18:15 GMT 1
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Apr 3, 2019 13:30:08 GMT 1
wow .... so ET crew follow the SB Boeing released after JT610 and still ..... From the first page of the newspaper European edition : "Pilots at the controls of the Boeing 737 MAX that crashed in March in Ethiopia initially followed emergency procedures laid out by the plane maker but still failed to recover control of the jet". www.wsj.com/europeThis story is getting worse and worse ... It gets even more worse... It is an egg in the face of those detractors who tried to pin everything on bad Lion Air maintenance and crew not following the manuals. This is a far more complex situation where the aircraft was inherently unsafe and put the crew under an overwhelming workload. Remember, the ET crash happened in excellent visible conditions. There's no chance anyone would have survived if adverse conditions were involved. The decision to ground the plane was unquestionable.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Apr 3, 2019 14:05:13 GMT 1
It gets even more worse... Baroque, we are discussing this piece of information in the 'Lion Air crash' thread. That the repair was made in the USA is unconclusive : we don't know whether or not Lion's maintenance made any mistake, or whether or not faulty sensors were the cause of erroneous indications in the first place.
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Apr 3, 2019 16:41:40 GMT 1
It gets even more worse... Baroque, we are discussing this piece of information in the 'Lion Air crash' thread. That the repair was made in the USA is unconclusive : we don't know whether or not Lion's maintenance made any mistake, or whether or not faulty sensors were the cause of erroneous indications in the first place. The egg on the face is because claims of bad pilots and bad service at Lion Air before anything was known.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Apr 3, 2019 17:16:08 GMT 1
^^^^^ above post - would be better placed in the Lion Air thread.
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Apr 3, 2019 20:40:59 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by kevin5345179 on Apr 3, 2019 20:45:54 GMT 1
It gets even more worse... Baroque, we are discussing this piece of information in the 'Lion Air crash' thread. That the repair was made in the USA is unconclusive : we don't know whether or not Lion's maintenance made any mistake, or whether or not faulty sensors were the cause of erroneous indications in the first place. Perhaps you are still the only person believes maintenance from JT still comes into play. Put JT flight aside, ET flight didn't have any issue reported in prior flight. As soon as AOA sensor failed, the plane is gone. Unless you are telling me maintenance can accurately predict AOA is going to fail. Otherwise, I still don't see how maintenance come into play ..... NO REDUNDANCY in such powerful flight control logic is the most unacceptable fact that Boeing needs to take responsibility at.
|
|