|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Apr 8, 2024 23:47:51 GMT 1
Sorry to intervene, but according to Fr24 tracking, the registration is VT-JRF, not VT-JRH. So this may not be msn 592, but rather msn 589. Also aviation flights confirms delivery of msn 589, instead. Can you please cross check?
The two pictures above from two different spotters are enough evidence. Also the call sign has 592 in it which points to it being msn 592 |
|
mtrunz
delivered!
Digital Aviation/Meteo Analyst
Posts: 1,956 
|
Post by mtrunz on Apr 9, 2024 15:21:41 GMT 1
Sorry to intervene, but according to Fr24 tracking, the registration is VT-JRF, not VT-JRH. So this may not be msn 592, but rather msn 589. Also aviation flights confirms delivery of msn 589, instead. Can you please cross check?
and also nothing on aviation flights is ever final 😉 mistakes can and will happen. |
|
|
|
Post by andyfe on Apr 9, 2024 22:40:25 GMT 1
Sorry to intervene, but according to Fr24 tracking, the registration is VT-JRF, not VT-JRH. So this may not be msn 592, but rather msn 589. Also aviation flights confirms delivery of msn 589, instead. Can you please cross check?
The two pictures above from two different spotters are enough evidence. Thank you. It was not easy to read registration in the pictures, but you are right. Also aviation flights has corrected the entry, and now reports delivery of msn 592 not msn 589. |
|
