XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on May 5, 2016 19:27:28 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on May 5, 2016 23:47:20 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by peter on May 6, 2016 11:02:20 GMT 1
Aircraft in the back looks to be MSN 7162, a CFM powered A320neo for Pegasus Airlines. I'm surprised to see the CFM powered A320neo jets going into storage as well. a380.boards.net/post/72250
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on May 6, 2016 11:31:10 GMT 1
Aircraft in the back looks to be MSN 7162, a CFM powered A320neo for Pegasus Airlines. I'm surprised to see the CFM powered A320neo jets going into storage as well. 1. The neo with the Leap is not yet certified. 2. Their seems to be trouble with the CFM Leap as well.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on May 6, 2016 12:22:55 GMT 1
Aircraft in the back looks to be MSN 7162, a CFM powered A320neo for Pegasus Airlines. I'm surprised to see the CFM powered A320neo jets going into storage as well. 1. The neo with the Leap is not yet certified. 2. Their seems to be trouble with the CFM Leap as well. Re the CFMs, they are offering re blading the third stage to extend life on wing past the already promised 7 years ! An interesting article below www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cfm-reblading-low-pressure-compressor-for-leap-engin-424985/
|
|
|
Post by addasih on May 9, 2016 17:53:19 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on May 10, 2016 12:59:41 GMT 1
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on May 10, 2016 15:30:48 GMT 1
Makes sense. Fewer stages and parts on the GTF. Wondering what the weight difference would be like between the LEAP-1B and the neo engines.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on May 10, 2016 15:34:30 GMT 1
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on May 10, 2016 16:54:31 GMT 1
Thanks for that! Goes to show how minor the weight penalty on the 81 inch fan PW1100G-JM is compared to the 69.4 inch fan MAX LEAP-1B. Only 78kg per engine or 2.8% heavier. On the other hand the 78 inch LEAP-1A is heavier than the LEAP-1B by a whopping 373kg per engine or about 13.4%.
|
|