someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,230
|
Post by someone on Jul 14, 2014 12:09:34 GMT 1
25 firm orders plus 50 option, for ATR-42-600 from the leasing company NAC.
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,230
|
Post by someone on Jul 15, 2014 12:56:16 GMT 1
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,230
|
Post by someone on Jul 16, 2014 17:38:30 GMT 1
|
|
rapoc
Final Assembly Line stage 1
...
Posts: 235
|
Post by rapoc on Jul 17, 2014 13:42:13 GMT 1
25 firm orders plus 50 option, for ATR-42-600 from the leasing company NAC. Any indications for which airline they are? |
|
|
|
Post by peter on Nov 28, 2014 19:03:08 GMT 1
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 29, 2014 9:14:40 GMT 1
Lower fuel prices so far do not stop airlines buying turboprops.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 29, 2014 11:43:24 GMT 1
ATR has a giant backlog, 4 years worth of production.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 29, 2014 13:29:17 GMT 1
ATR has a giant backlog, 4 years worth of production. Yes, but the turboprop/regional jet threshold moves with oil prices. High oil prices seemed to have doomed 50-seat jets, could they be attractive again with lower fuel prices ? |
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957 
|
Post by s543 on Nov 30, 2014 0:40:05 GMT 1
On short haul the difference in speed is negligible - it takes much longer to get to the airport, be processed, get back and on typical 700 km route the flight difference of 20 minutes is negligible.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Nov 30, 2014 13:07:10 GMT 1
Regarding production, I found this on a.net:
|
|
