bookworm
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
Posts: 62
|
Post by bookworm on Nov 19, 2015 12:08:08 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 19, 2015 18:03:41 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Nov 22, 2015 18:42:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Nov 22, 2015 18:58:29 GMT 1
That only means that FR24 / jetphotos.net databases have been updated to link to that registration rather than the test reg. The plane only emits the hex code, unless the pilots enter the registration as the call sign or flight number, as a lot of biz jets do. That's also why it does not now show a photo of the aircraft as they have not updated that part of their database to link the real reg to a photo !
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,502
|
Post by sciing on Nov 22, 2015 19:48:27 GMT 1
The HEX was changed to a Vietnam one, it is not an Airbus, french one. Indeed delivery.
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Nov 22, 2015 19:53:17 GMT 1
The HEX was changed to a Vietnam one, it is not an Airbus, french one. Indeed delivery. Fair point, it is a Sunday, I am not in work mode Just drink mode
|
|
|
Post by bmw801 on Nov 22, 2015 20:17:26 GMT 1
hwww.flightradar24.com shows now also her final VN Registration VN-A889
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 23, 2015 21:26:31 GMT 1
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,502
|
Post by sciing on Nov 24, 2015 7:38:50 GMT 1
Quite strange, MSN16 was also visible with final reg some days before TAC date and official delivery (day before delivery flight). So if it is similar, delivery would be today and flight tommorow? But I wonder the reason, maybe some legal stuff with the leasing company??
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 24, 2015 9:58:28 GMT 1
But I wonder the reason, maybe some legal stuff with the leasing company?? ... Or VN wanted to take a few pictures, and needed the final registration to that purpose.
|
|