|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 21, 2015 18:59:28 GMT 1
Surprise! New MSN is MSN200
|
|
|
Post by Shadow123 on Jan 21, 2015 19:01:49 GMT 1
First Time that nobody has the right answer?
|
|
|
Post by behappy on Jan 21, 2015 20:00:21 GMT 1
Well maybe no, i remember MSN99 had zero or one vote, and one frame of Qatar caught everyone as well
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jan 21, 2015 22:10:14 GMT 1
How ever surprising, it has some logic.... First 2 class, almost HOV.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jan 21, 2015 22:41:15 GMT 1
And we just had the MSN's in sequence
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 21, 2015 23:55:22 GMT 1
Which would be the one now considered "in sequence", the one just following the new MSN? 201?
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Jan 22, 2015 0:30:45 GMT 1
Which would be the one now considered "in sequence", the one just following the new MSN? 201? Oh, I'm surprised we haven't defined what "in sequence" means. I would define it as the lowest MSN number yet to be convoyed.
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 22, 2015 0:43:20 GMT 1
This'll then be the new rule So let's then settle on answer #4 yes (change to: 1 pt Wrong-MSN, 3 pts right MSN-in-seq., 7 pts right MSN-ouf-of-seq.)This'll be the new rule for the MSN-betting game from and after Convoy 2015/01 Thanks all for participating in the conversation and in the poll and more widely for guessing with us ! Right MSNs in 2015: FabienA380 1 helios91 1 someone 1 rapoc 1 s543 1 Rumol 1 a380limey 1 addasih 1 spiritualized 1 XWB 1 kevo350 1 ecpa 1 foreigner 1 dani 1 philidor 1 cargobull 1 nicolele 1 Festus 1 danteg 1 julytourist 1 solly 1 peter 1 sciing 1 vb6610 1 Shadow123 1 grisu17 1 Baroque 1 henge 1 AOIspotter 1 tangomaniac 1 egllaviation 1 wiedlsepp 1 Points for 2015: rapoc 4 FabienA380 4 s543 4 addasih 4 vb6610 4 Festus 4 Shadow123 4 someone 4 peter 4 grisu17 4 spiritualized 4 cargobull 4 kevo350 4 Baroque 4 henge 4 nicolele 4 XWB 4 dani 4 AOIspotter 4 ecpa 4 foreigner 4 a380limey 4 wiedlsepp 4 philidor 4 helios91 4 egllaviation 4 sciing 4 danteg 4 Rumol 4 julytourist 4 solly 3 tangomaniac 3 limoncello 2 harty236 2 airny 2 sunjet 2 mjoelnir 2 A380-G-XLEA 2 behappy 2 tomparis1 2 trumpton 1 paulc145 1 aranes380 1 tamzeed 1 spotterxfw 1 petera380 1 howard 1 looking good again?
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 22, 2015 0:45:33 GMT 1
Which would be the one now considered "in sequence", the one just following the new MSN? 201? Oh, I'm surprised we haven't defined what "in sequence" means. I would define it as the lowest MSN number yet to be convoyed. Interesting indeed I think both could be, either lowest MSN non-convoyed but I would tend to think it would rather be the MSN right after the last new one (in this case, MSN201 as the new MSN today is MSN200?....)..
|
|
Festus
Final Assembly Line stage 1
Posts: 272
|
Post by Festus on Jan 22, 2015 0:49:39 GMT 1
I'll also go with Etihad #5, MSN191. Are there also any other Emirates frames planned which are still in the old configuration? There might be different timings for the 2-class configuration and the other, let's say traditional LR and ULR configurations. I had some idea of 2 different sequences for Emirates in the back of my mind, but didn't dare to go out of sequence . This plane is some kind of HoV. So for Emirates we might have kind of two "threads" of MSNs.
|
|