|
Post by egllaviation on Jan 28, 2015 14:15:26 GMT 1
Very difficult this time to select a frame...but BA (192) for me.
|
|
Rumol
in Preparation for Body Join
Posts: 114
|
Post by Rumol on Jan 28, 2015 15:54:33 GMT 1
Could you please explain? What I remember of that contest is not the songs, it is juries listing the points they mete out to different countries, for instance : Turkey 12 points, Spain 10 points ... UK 6 points ... Ukraine 3 points ... Malta 1 point. ... and all that points listing takes nearly half of the show time while juries from all participating countries announce their points... good evening from Bratislava! ... good evening from Zagreb!... etc etc... Anyway... I keep sticking with MSN191
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 29, 2015 5:10:35 GMT 1
So this time then .any wrong MSN would give 1 point, .right MSN would give 3 points for both MSN191 and MSN201, and .right MSN for any other MSN would give 7 points Current 34 bets for Convoy of 2015/03 starting tonight (Wednesday 28): 20 bets for Etihad Airways #5 (MSN191, considered in sequence): addasih, a380limey, Shadow123, XWB, vb6610, Baroque, henge, s543, philidor, someone, Festus, nicolele, sciing, ecpa, wiedlsepp, cargobull, spiritualized, grisu17, aranes380 and Rumol, 11 bets for British Airways #10 (MSN192): FabienA380, mjoelnir, harty236, BA380-G-XLEA, AOIspotter, peter, paulc415, sunjet, airny, julytourist and egllaviation, 2 bets for Transaero Airlines #1 (MSN196): behappy and tomparis1, and 1 bet for Emirates #69 (MSN201, considered in sequence): foreigner.
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 29, 2015 5:16:37 GMT 1
Another idea and before we know the new MSN in a few days,
could we consider the 'in-sequence' if the 'following-MSN' follows TWO previous MSNs convoyed in a row?..... (thus starting a 'slightly better'-'new-sequence'?....)
Concretely this time, MSN191 would be considered in sequence as the TWO previous ones were convoyed in a row (MSN189 then MSN190), MSN201 would not be considered in sequence for this time as only ONE MSN would have been convoyed 'in sequence following MSNs' before (MSN200), then if MSN201 is convoyed this time, MSN200+MSN201 convoyed in a row would start a 'new-sequence' and then, both MSN191 and MSN202 could be considered 'in-sequence' thereafter?......
Thoughts?
|
|
solly
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
Posts: 91
|
Post by solly on Jan 29, 2015 8:26:07 GMT 1
MSN191 regards solly
|
|
|
Post by peter on Jan 29, 2015 14:21:41 GMT 1
Technically you are correct. Good idea !
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Jan 29, 2015 14:44:26 GMT 1
oky thanks peter! So this time then (CHANGE AGAIN SORRY) .any wrong MSN would give 1 point, .right MSN would give 3 points for ONLY MSN191 (considered 'in-sequence'), and .right MSN for any other MSN including MSN201 would give 7 points Current 35 bets for Convoy of 2015/03 starting last night (Wednesday 28): 21 bets for Etihad Airways #5 (MSN191, considered in sequence): addasih, a380limey, Shadow123, XWB, vb6610, Baroque, henge, s543, philidor, someone, Festus, nicolele, sciing, ecpa, wiedlsepp, cargobull, spiritualized, grisu17, aranes380, Rumol and solly, 11 bets for British Airways #10 (MSN192): FabienA380, mjoelnir, harty236, BA380-G-XLEA, AOIspotter, peter, paulc415, sunjet, airny, julytourist and egllaviation, 2 bets for Transaero Airlines #1 (MSN196): behappy and tomparis1, and 1 bet for Emirates #69 (MSN201, NOT considered in sequence this time....): foreigner. still time to change the bet if necessary....(though no need to post/confirm is no change of bet) addasih a380limey Shadow123 XWB vb6610 Baroque henge s543 philidor someone Festus nicolele sciing ecpa wiedlsepp cargobull spiritualized grisu17 aranes380 Rumol solly mjoelnir harty236 BA380-G-XLEA AOIspotter peter paulc415 sunjet airny julytourist egllaviation behappy tomparis1 foreigner
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Jan 29, 2015 14:46:22 GMT 1
Another idea and before we know the new MSN in a few days, could we consider the 'in-sequence' if the 'following-MSN' follows TWO previous MSNs convoyed in a row?..... (thus starting a 'slightly better'-'new-sequence'?....) Concretely this time, MSN191 would be considered in sequence as the TWO previous ones were convoyed in a row (MSN189 then MSN190), MSN201 would not be considered in sequence for this time as only ONE MSN would have been convoyed 'in sequence following MSNs' before (MSN200), then if MSN201 is convoyed this time, MSN200+MSN201 convoyed in a row would start a 'new-sequence' and then, both MSN191 and MSN202 could be considered 'in-sequence' thereafter?...... Thoughts? I think this new idea is better.
|
|
|
Post by foreigner on Jan 29, 2015 15:29:57 GMT 1
All I can say that if 2 different MSNs (i.e. 191 and 201) would be considered IN-sequence, it would be quite confusing. Then it would be better to use a system of 3 pts for the right answer and 1 pt for wrong, IMO.
|
|
rapoc
Final Assembly Line stage 1
...
Posts: 235
|
Post by rapoc on Jan 29, 2015 15:54:53 GMT 1
I will go with the next Speedbird ...
|
|