XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 4, 2016 15:14:53 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 4, 2016 15:16:19 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Oct 4, 2016 15:18:04 GMT 1
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,502 
|
Post by sciing on Jan 11, 2017 22:11:56 GMT 1
This is a list of A320 delivered, but not flown out
MSN type FAL 1st flight delivery customer
6733 A320 TLS 24.08.15 22.12.15 Saudi Gulf
7396 A320 TSN 18.1.17 13.2.17 Chengdu
7452 A320 TSN 7.3.17 21.3.17 Chengdu
7485 A320 TSN 30.3.17 11.4.17 Chengdu
7502 A320 TLS 20.1.17 10.2.17 Vueling, CDB leasing
7595 A320 XFW 6.3.17 14.3.17 Vueling, CDB leasing stored in TLS 15.3.17
|
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Jan 11, 2017 23:47:52 GMT 1
This is a list of A320 delivered, but not flown out MSN type FAL 1st flight delivery customer 6733 A320 TLS 24.08.15 22.12.15 Saudi Gulf 6993 A320 TSN 04.05.16 30.05.16 Qingdao 6995 A320 TLS 17.02.16 11.03.16 Qingdao 7082 A320 TSN 01.07.16 26.07.16 Qingdao 7229 A321 XFW 17.08.16 31.08.16 Juneyao 7303 A321 XFW 30.08.16 08.09.16 Juneyao 7314 A320 TSN 28.11.16 15.12.16 Chengdu 7322 A321 XFW 22.09.16 31.10.16 Juneyao 7361 A320 TSN 22.12.16 29.12.16 Tibet 7445 A321 XFW 30.11.16 09.12.16 Juneyao I still prefer to call them, paid for but not delivered  |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,502
|
Post by sciing on Jan 12, 2017 6:45:21 GMT 1
welcome😂
It would great, if someone has insides in the real legal status or what are the issues?
For example MSN 6993 did a testflight today still with test reg.
|
|
cck
Final Assembly Line stage 1
Posts: 228
|
Post by cck on Jan 12, 2017 7:26:53 GMT 1
9/10 of them are for Chinese airline, could it be some restrictions imposed by Chinese government to those big airlines to limit number of aircrafts in overly congested airspace?
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jan 12, 2017 10:15:27 GMT 1
I object to this thread title, which contradicts all other threads.
Everywhere on site the verb 'deliver' means 'transfer aircraft property from the manufacturer to the customer', NOT 'fly it away'. Whenever an aircraft official delivery date is different from her flyaway date, we use the former. That is why, for instance, these last few days Addasih took the pain to change our estimated delivery dates for official ones. Here, the same verb is used to mean 'fly away', which is confusing.
Anybody is free to be interested in flyaway dates but, to be consistent, the thread title should be 'A320s delivered but not flied away'.
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jan 12, 2017 10:20:56 GMT 1
welcome😂 It would great, if someone has insides in the real legal status or what are the issues? For example MSN 6993 did a testflight today still with test reg. If it flies with test regs - it was not delivered - i.e. it is still a property of Airbus ! |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jan 12, 2017 10:21:53 GMT 1
9/10 of them are for Chinese airline, could it be some restrictions imposed by Chinese government to those big airlines to limit number of aircrafts in overly congested airspace? There might indeed be some Chinese bureaucratic reason, but I think it's more probably that officials were not available at year-end to rubber-stamp aircraft introduction. I posted in another thread that I suspect this kind of thing happened to LATAM's latest A350. |
|
