mtrunz
delivered!
Digital Aviation/Meteo Analyst
Posts: 1,956 
|
Post by mtrunz on Nov 18, 2016 17:00:28 GMT 1
So what does this mean for MSN 7418? I'm a bit confused but i suppose we'll see what happens. |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 18, 2016 17:26:41 GMT 1
So what does this mean for MSN 7418? I'm a bit confused but i suppose we'll see what happens. Nothing has changed so far. Before entering into force, any proposed US legislation must clear three hurdles : 1 pass the House of Representatives - this is what has just happened ; 2 pass the US Senate (with exactly the same language) ; 3 not be vetoed by the US President. Step 2 is uncertain, as the Senate, which has the larger influence on foreign policy, is unlikely to follow the House's lead. Anyhow, the Senate is unlikely to pass new legislation soon because step 3 would make it pointless. Step 3 is not happening before January 20th, when Trump enters the White House. |
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Nov 18, 2016 18:04:44 GMT 1
So what does this mean for MSN 7418? I'm a bit confused but i suppose we'll see what happens. Nothing has changed so far. Before entering into force, any proposed US legislation must clear three hurdles : 1 pass the House of Representatives - this is what has just happened ; 2 pass the US Senate (with exactly the same language) ; 3 not be vetoed by the US President. Step 2 is uncertain, as the Senate, which has the larger influence on foreign policy, is unlikely to follow the House's lead. Anyhow, the Senate is unlikely to pass new legislation soon because step 3 would make it pointless. Step 3 is not happening before January 20th, when Trump enters the White House. I thought step 1 was a vote against exports to Iran ? |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 18, 2016 21:01:17 GMT 1
I thought step 1 was a vote against exports to Iran ? Whatever the subject, the process is the same : nothing is done until the three steps have been made. In this case, the House voted against exports to Iran, but this vote in itself has no binding consequences. |
|
shpeex
spotted unpainted on the Flight Line (waiting for painting)
Posts: 1,141
|
Post by shpeex on Nov 22, 2016 9:36:09 GMT 1
Well, it's obvious that Airbus can forget about 6 A321neo and 4 A330-800 orders...
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Nov 22, 2016 14:44:32 GMT 1
"It is obvious TransAsia stocks were involvedWell, it's obvious that Airbus can forget about 6 A321neo and 4 A330-800 orders... That would make HA the only airline with the A330-800 on order, with just 6. |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 22, 2016 15:13:23 GMT 1
... But speculation about this sub-type not being built is pointless, since we know that the first A338 are being built now.
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959
|
Post by s543 on Nov 22, 2016 16:21:06 GMT 1
Up to that they need it for new MRTT
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Nov 23, 2016 1:12:17 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Nov 26, 2016 0:12:10 GMT 1
... But speculation about this sub-type not being built is pointless, since we know that the first A338 are being built now. Is it known that the A330-800neo is being built at the moment? I thought the first one being built is a -900 one?.. |
|
