s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on May 5, 2015 18:39:15 GMT 1
I think for PRG it is the government (or whoever else?....) that is opposed to the introduction of the A380 there, as it was for so long in India?..... (or do I confuse with VIE?... or is it both?...) No the government still owns the airport and they did built up the gate. I believe it is only on Emirates decision if they can fill it up.
|
|
|
Post by Shadow123 on Jun 1, 2015 16:56:30 GMT 1
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jun 1, 2015 18:13:33 GMT 1
Another route which started just over a year back with 773 and is on 380 so short a time later.
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jun 1, 2015 19:38:22 GMT 1
Here it is hard to understand since the fare on the route MXP-JFK (where was a "yell" of EU airlines) is not low. You can get better deal from others.
|
|
|
Post by peter on Jun 1, 2015 23:07:10 GMT 1
You can get better deal from others. Yup, but not in an A380
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jun 2, 2015 7:16:26 GMT 1
You can get better deal from others. Yup, but not in an A380 Even in A380 from AF - it gets close to 100 EUR cheaper (for Y of course).
|
|
|
Post by Shadow123 on Jun 3, 2015 10:26:15 GMT 1
Yup, but not in an A380 Even in A380 from AF - it gets close to 100 EUR cheaper (for Y of course). Yes, but AF is no nonstop flight MXP-JFK... Nonstop are mostly not the cheapest flights.
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jun 3, 2015 10:30:04 GMT 1
Well I was not meaning MXP-JFK but EU somewhere-JFK.
i.e. from spot without direct connection or with an expensive one to JFK.
|
|
kronus
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,205
|
Post by kronus on Jun 9, 2015 15:12:42 GMT 1
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,957
|
Post by s543 on Jun 9, 2015 20:02:37 GMT 1
For sure interesting for EU travellers.
|
|