|
|
Post by Shadow123 on Jun 9, 2017 18:11:22 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadow123 on Jun 12, 2017 13:38:46 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jun 12, 2017 18:08:22 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Jun 12, 2017 19:18:15 GMT 1
|
|
ghorn
Outfitting in Hamburg
Posts: 993
|
Post by ghorn on Jun 25, 2017 13:16:04 GMT 1
What chance that this frame will be delivered this month ? Is the political crisis likely to cause further delays with QR frames ?
Geoff
|
|
|
|
Post by ff on Jun 25, 2017 14:54:00 GMT 1
I think paying for an new aircraft would be very low down the current Qatar purchase list.
And I can't see this current crisis ends quickly or nicely.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jun 25, 2017 15:15:44 GMT 1
What chance that this frame will be delivered this month ? Is the political crisis likely to cause further delays with QR frames ? I imagine QR suffers from a drop in demand and would probably like to differ deliveries. With government support, the company may however decide to act as if nothing had happened, and take delivery of upcoming frames. |
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959 
|
Post by s543 on Jun 26, 2017 0:00:18 GMT 1
What chance that this frame will be delivered this month ? Is the political crisis likely to cause further delays with QR frames ? I imagine QR suffers from a drop in demand and would probably like to differ deliveries. With government support, the company may however decide to act as if nothing had happened, and take delivery of upcoming frames. Up to that while flying around it takes longer - so they need more equipment. |
|
|
|
Post by ff on Jun 26, 2017 9:39:25 GMT 1
I imagine QR suffers from a drop in demand and would probably like to differ deliveries. With government support, the company may however decide to act as if nothing had happened, and take delivery of upcoming frames. Up to that while flying around it takes longer - so they need more equipment. Less demand and less route/destination to cover, so definitely less equipment needed. |
|
|
|
Post by fanairbus on Jun 26, 2017 9:47:51 GMT 1
Surely there is a point where a customer, having requested a manufacturer to construct a product for them within a certain timeframe, has no right to delay the purchase without a financial penalty. After all, Airbus have spent a lot of money to date on the frames that fester in Toulouse. One would hope that Airbus have paid their suppliers and are 'taking the revenue stream hit' themselves at present.
|
|
