philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jun 27, 2017 0:47:07 GMT 1
Surely there is a point where a customer, having requested a manufacturer to construct a product for them within a certain timeframe, has no right to delay the purchase without a financial penalty. From a legal standpoint, you are right. Legal aspects, however, are only part of the relationship between a manufacturer and a customer. Commercial concerns favour a compromise, especially when the customer is seen as having a bright future. |
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959 
|
Post by s543 on Jun 27, 2017 8:55:24 GMT 1
Surely there is a point where a customer, having requested a manufacturer to construct a product for them within a certain timeframe, has no right to delay the purchase without a financial penalty. From a legal standpoint, you are right. Legal aspects, however, are only part of the relationship between a manufacturer and a customer. Commercial concerns favour a compromise, especially when the customer is seen as having a bright future. Even if the mentioned customer behaves like a HOG  |
|
|
|
Post by a380admirer on Jun 27, 2017 16:01:28 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Jun 30, 2017 15:28:10 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by a380admirer on Jun 30, 2017 15:42:13 GMT 1
I can't believe it, have we Christmas. So an possible delivery in August or September  |
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959
|
Post by s543 on Jun 30, 2017 21:18:21 GMT 1
ONLY 40 SNs behind normal customer WOW !
|
|
|
|
Post by a380admirer on Jul 1, 2017 9:15:44 GMT 1
|
|
burns
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
A321 NEO !!!
Posts: 82
|
Post by burns on Jul 1, 2017 10:03:26 GMT 1
It's interesting that oly QR Ac are so far behind schedule
|
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Jul 1, 2017 16:48:07 GMT 1
|
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913
|
Post by backstroke on Jul 3, 2017 6:37:38 GMT 1
|
|
