|
|
Post by a380admirer on Jul 3, 2017 14:34:24 GMT 1
Okay, I think backstroke and XWB are right, MSN115 was between 32L-14L-N8 and 32L-14R-N8, this is on the end from Runway 32L and near the DC, it should be MSN76, strange that MSN76 was moved again today, it was already moved to the DC on 30th June 2017.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Jul 7, 2017 11:07:50 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jul 7, 2017 11:12:15 GMT 1
It may explain why MSN 78 never performed its first flight.
|
|
|
|
Post by f5 on Jul 7, 2017 12:13:05 GMT 1
Looking on MSN does this make sense to paint airliner endangered by cancelling (MSN90)? And planes already equiped with seats, galleys atc. sitting on the tarmac ??
To cancel those waiting before FAL or within production chain yet would have less efect, even if the delivery schedule will be adjusted to QR request for those already equiped and ready to perform flight tests.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jul 7, 2017 12:37:39 GMT 1
Looking on MSN does this make sense to paint airliner endangered by cancelling (MSN90)? And planes already equiped with seats, galleys atc. sitting on the tarmac ?? To cancel those waiting before FAL or within production chain yet would have less efect, even if the delivery schedule will be adjusted to QR request for those already equiped and ready to perform flight tests. If the problem is managed by both sides acting together, such solutions may be implemented. If however both sides are showing their muscles, then one-sided initiatives tend to prevail. |
|
backstroke
delivered!
Just an aerospace engineer with thirst for knowledge
Posts: 1,913 
|
Post by backstroke on Jul 20, 2017 14:47:31 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Jul 21, 2017 14:58:43 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Jul 21, 2017 15:33:49 GMT 1
It is one of the 4 cancelled frames ? |
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Jul 21, 2017 15:37:22 GMT 1
It is one of the 4 cancelled frames ? Should be. |
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Jul 21, 2017 15:54:07 GMT 1
|
|
