|
Post by Jkkw on Jun 27, 2016 2:24:25 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Jun 27, 2016 3:23:11 GMT 1
Where were the fire trucks?
|
|
|
Post by peter on Jun 27, 2016 9:39:52 GMT 1
Where were the fire trucks? Already waiting ( Tweet)
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Jun 27, 2016 9:46:25 GMT 1
The passengers were stopped from evacuating by cabin announcement and waited on board while the fire brigade put out the fire first. Well done to all I'd say. This could have ended differently. They had turned back and flew on for two hours with their "issue" before if I understand correctly?
Nobody hurt. Respect.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jun 27, 2016 13:50:59 GMT 1
I am impressed by the professionalism of the crew : with a wing engulfed in flames, they did not panic and refrained from ordering a dangerous evacuation. Kudos !
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Jun 27, 2016 13:58:54 GMT 1
Holy c***. With the entire wing of a fuel loaded aircraft on fire like that, it was surely a ticking time bomb. Very fortunate outcome.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jun 27, 2016 14:45:21 GMT 1
Holy c***. With the entire wing of a fuel loaded aircraft on fire like that, it was surely a ticking time bomb. Very fortunate outcome. I think the fire brigade had the fire under control as soon as the aircraft landed. They probably advised against evacuation on account of toxic fumes from firefighting products. This reminds me of the QF A380 emergency landing in Singapore, when they kept the passengers in their seats for 2 hours or so while the fire was being suppressed.
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on Nov 10, 2016 9:25:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Nov 10, 2016 10:41:10 GMT 1
Incredible.
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Nov 10, 2016 14:43:18 GMT 1
Wow! Incredible indeed. I have to wonder though, if the heat shock will somehow affect the fatigue life of some of the wing parts.
|
|