XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Apr 22, 2015 22:55:47 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on May 19, 2015 18:05:08 GMT 1
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503 
|
Post by sciing on May 19, 2015 20:02:38 GMT 1
I guess they need some space in the A380 FL for MSN 181+183, MSN 194.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on May 19, 2015 23:49:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on May 20, 2015 0:19:52 GMT 1
MSN176 should come to TLS as well  "MSN194" do you mean MSN192BA that should roll out soon?..... |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503
|
Post by sciing on May 20, 2015 5:09:19 GMT 1
Yes, MSN192 of course. Sorry for the confusion.
Are you sure about MSN 176, because as far as I remember the other 2 Etihad frames were delivered from XFW?
|
|
momo7747
in Convoy en route to Toulouse
Posts: 82
|
Post by momo7747 on May 20, 2015 5:13:04 GMT 1
Does anyone know the negative impact that is the result of not having the engines on the wings (the weight of the engines)? That is, if there is one! Cheers, Romaan |
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503
|
Post by sciing on May 20, 2015 5:31:39 GMT 1
It looks quite odd, not the beauty as with engines;-)
There might some parts where you need a load to be balanced. But I think for an aircraft to stand on the ground is nothing compared to the loads of a flight cycle.
Maybe extensive towing is an issue for the front landing gear.
|
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on May 20, 2015 5:48:24 GMT 1
It was mentioned here in the forum that MSN176 should be delivered from TLS (apparently same as QTR, 2 first frames from XFW and the rest from TLS) |
|
|
|
Post by Jkkw on May 20, 2015 7:52:27 GMT 1
Does anyone know the negative impact that is the result of not having the engines on the wings (the weight of the engines)? That is, if there is one! Cheers, Romaan if you're not careful, this  I'm not sure what else was removed from the aircraft though. |
|
