XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Sept 28, 2013 13:57:11 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Oct 2, 2013 16:13:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Oct 15, 2013 12:45:09 GMT 1
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,336
|
Post by someone on Oct 15, 2013 13:40:14 GMT 1
If the article is correct it mean ILFC has sold EI-LNA and LNB to Dr. Peters |
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Oct 15, 2013 15:36:57 GMT 1
Could this be linked to any hidden compensation for Norwegian by Boeing for the tech delays? Like Boeing pays the lease or parts now or something? (pure speculation) I just noticed that Norwegian calmed down very sudden.
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,336
|
Post by someone on Oct 15, 2013 21:14:23 GMT 1
Could this be linked to any hidden compensation for Norwegian by Boeing for the tech delays? Like Boeing pays the lease or parts now or something? (pure speculation) I just noticed that Norwegian calmed down very sudden. Probably not |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Oct 15, 2013 22:11:11 GMT 1
Just a frequent aircraft finance framework, a sales and lease back, whereby the airline orders the aircraft, then sells it to a financial company and leases it back for an agreed duration.
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Oct 15, 2013 22:14:32 GMT 1
The original lessor, IFLC, seems to have sold the contract to the second lessor Dr. Peters Group.
|
|
|
|
Post by airboche on Oct 16, 2013 8:54:28 GMT 1
But why would ILFC sell it's brand new aircraft? I mean it is a leasing company and it has had a leasing customer with contract for these two aircraft? The only reason can be that somebody wanted a new contract (with new terms?).
This seems to be different from an airline buying an aircraft first and then doing the typical sale and leaseback routine with itself for tax reasons or whatever.
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,336
|
Post by someone on Dec 18, 2013 8:09:12 GMT 1
|
|
