Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 10, 2014 20:13:57 GMT 1
... if your picture seems to be too dark! Just as with today's EK MSN 154 at the end of the CFF. Half backlight on the white body viewing the shadowed side plus the shadow under wings and belly made it difficult to decide how many stops to use to get a better overall exposure. I took +1/3 I'll show the original before and after using Photoshop. The original's exposure is fine on the white nose (pure white there, that was measured by the spot metering) the sky is perfect too, but who cares if all the rest is nearly dark: The dark contains information we can't see in this picture. After using functions Photoshop (and other apps) offer to lighten the dark parts I stopped at this point: The picture now is not perfect but more interesting for the purpose in the MSN 154 thread. Please don't ask me what to do: there are zillions of How Tos on the net. The shortest way to learn are tutorials on YouTube. Just keep in mind: under exposed is much better than over exposed: light details pushed to white stay white, there is no way back
|
|
|
Post by julytourist on Oct 11, 2014 1:02:18 GMT 1
Thanks Linie for sharing this, I only have a 'point and shoot' camera which is useless for the planes as they approach close bye at c.1800 ft on approach to the northern runway at Heathrow,,,,,,,,,,,,,, JT
|
|
Baroque
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,991
|
Post by Baroque on Oct 11, 2014 14:33:54 GMT 1
Photoshop is awesome, especially camera raw. Indeed, I have used it to "rescue" a few fantastic shots that had come out bad.
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Oct 11, 2014 14:49:12 GMT 1
Thank you for the lesson, Linie 9 ! Learning is a pleasure !
|
|
Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 11, 2014 23:25:15 GMT 1
Nice to read your reactions, THX If someone has a problem with a pic he/she might show it. Perhaps we can help.
|
|
Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 12, 2014 0:45:23 GMT 1
Thanks Linie for sharing this, I only have a 'point and shoot' camera which is useless for the planes as they approach close bye at c.1800 ft on approach to the northern runway at Heathrow,,,,,,,,,,,,,, JT Don't give up! Some pictures here I made with a point & shoot cam AKA pocket cam, a Lumix. Give your cam a try and show us what you can get
|
|
|
Post by julytourist on Oct 12, 2014 19:41:50 GMT 1
Thanks Linie for the encouragement. I have tried but at no zoom the image is too distant and at max zoom it is still too far away and the quality suffers. I doubt any editing could produce a decent picture. Also I do not have a tripod....... I bought the camera in a hurry before my (only) flight on GXLEA as I had left my other camera at a friends. I fly fish so was attracted by it being waterproof/shockproof. It is a Fuji XP60. JT
|
|
Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 13, 2014 20:33:24 GMT 1
I see! 5x zoom is not enough. May be sometimes you can get closer to Heathrow's runways...
|
|
Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 13, 2014 21:07:34 GMT 1
Today, spotterxfw showed us a very rare motive of QR2 landing taking off at XFW: It is not his thing to edit his images, so I asked him if I may use it to demonstrate what's possible. There were only three steps with his original: highlighting the shadows and then spreading the levels sharpening a bit and denoising (spotterxfw used ISO 1000 because the lack of light) The levels are overdone (darkest gray became black, lighter gray white) just to show what's possible. Usually I would have kept it at about 40-50% to stay at the gray in gray: the sky is too lightened now The dark corners are vignetting by the lens used.
|
|
Linie 9
in service - 1 year
Posts: 2,761
|
Post by Linie 9 on Oct 28, 2014 2:40:30 GMT 1
|
|