philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Jan 4, 2016 22:59:16 GMT 1
Sorry, but this chart doesn't make sense to me. Is shows that trip cost for A320-200 CEO is almost double than 737-800?  Any perceived anomaly could be explained if the chart uses actual numbers from existing HA aircraft. Some aircraft types in their fleet have certainly been delivered more recently than others, skewing the numbers. For instance, have their A320ceos been fitted with sharklets ? EDIT : I pointed out in my previous post that the numbers are DOC (capital costs included). Differences in book value (hence depreciation or ownership costs) may weigh heavily on the results. |
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Jan 4, 2016 23:28:39 GMT 1
Sorry, but this chart doesn't make sense to me. Is shows that trip cost for A320-200 CEO is almost double than 737-800? Any perceived anomaly could be explained if the chart uses actual numbers from existing HA aircraft. Some aircraft types in their fleet have certainly been delivered more recently than others, skewing the numbers. For instance, have their A320ceos been fitted with sharklets ? EDIT : I pointed out in my previous post that the numbers are DOC (capital costs included). Differences in book value (hence depreciation or ownership costs) may weigh heavily on the results. You are missing the point. The chart has no numbers associated with it ! On the bottom axis the difference between each of the dividing points could be £0.0001 or it might be £1.00 who knows? I guess it is always to suit the company posting the graph, to make a point ! Therefore with this graph they now need to reduce their ticket prices dramatically  No numbers on the chart means they don't won't you to know how close they all are ! |
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Jan 4, 2016 23:52:39 GMT 1
I will try and get an answer ?
|
|
|
|
Post by stealthmanbob on Jan 5, 2016 0:08:11 GMT 1
Sorry, but this chart doesn't make sense to me. Is shows that trip cost for A320-200 CEO is almost double than 737-800? Any perceived anomaly could be explained if the chart uses actual numbers from existing HA aircraft. Some aircraft types in their fleet have certainly been delivered more recently than others, skewing the numbers. For instance, have their A320ceos been fitted with sharklets ? EDIT : I pointed out in my previous post that the numbers are DOC (capital costs included). Differences in book value (hence depreciation or ownership costs) may weigh heavily on the results. Have they got any aircraft in the graph ? www.planespotters.net/airline/Hawaiian-Airlines |
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 1, 2016 10:32:53 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Feb 1, 2016 11:36:40 GMT 1
And the second motorized by P&W, what is the status? Does he wait for a solution with engines before flight tests?
|
|
mjoelnir
in service - 2 years
Posts: 4,089
|
Post by mjoelnir on Feb 1, 2016 13:23:12 GMT 1
And the second motorized by P&W, what is the status? Does he wait for a solution with engines before flight tests? That would be pretty sensible, using an engine that is production standard with the software and hardware fix. |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 1, 2016 14:52:21 GMT 1
And the second motorized by P&W, what is the status? Does he wait for a solution with engines before flight tests? If, as we are being explained, the only issues occur in-between flights, on the ground, why not start flying ? |
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 2, 2016 10:41:59 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 3, 2016 23:35:33 GMT 1
|
|
