XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jan 29, 2016 22:53:59 GMT 1
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Jan 30, 2016 17:13:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by peter on Feb 1, 2016 1:03:54 GMT 1
Another QR A320neo (MSN 6904) went into storage at TLS. Looks like U-Turn Al is not going to accept those birds as they are now. But.... what's new??
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 1, 2016 1:54:52 GMT 1
Looks like U-Turn Al is not going to accept those birds as they are now. But.... what's new?? As they have no engine, flyaway would be a challenge ...
|
|
someone
in service - 1 year
Posts: 3,333
|
Post by someone on Feb 1, 2016 10:32:10 GMT 1
Another QR A320neo (MSN 6904) went into storage at TLS. Looks like U-Turn Al is not going to accept those birds as they are now. But.... what's new?? Actually, here he is quite consistent. Why should they take delivery of an aircraft with a "faulty" engine?
|
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Feb 1, 2016 14:09:23 GMT 1
Actually, here he is quite consistent. Why should they take delivery of an aircraft with a "faulty" engine? AAB is consistent with his refusal of acting as the launch customer he had previously accepted to be. The airframer and the engine manufacturer need feedback from real world operations, provided by the launch customer. This involves some risk, and is rewarded by a special additional discount. The reason LH took up the challenge that frightened QR probably lies in their large nearby maintenance facilities.
|
|
XWB
in service - 11 years
Posts: 16,115
|
Post by XWB on Feb 1, 2016 23:04:28 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by nicolele on Feb 8, 2016 13:40:09 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by pa380scal on Feb 16, 2016 14:26:14 GMT 1
|
|
s543
in service - 2 years
Posts: 3,959
|
Post by s543 on Feb 16, 2016 15:13:37 GMT 1
From the above mentioned article:
So we will probably see some engine-less neos for a many month coming.
|
|