|
|
Post by addasih on Mar 13, 2019 13:20:55 GMT 1
Looks like msn 265 will be leased from LATAM to QR for 2 years: "MSN 265 (JJ#12) sporting its final reg (A7-AQA to become PR-XTJ upon lease return) - delivery this week. This frame is being leased by LATAM Airlines to Qatar Airways. Of the 12 frames owned by LATAM post delivery, 2 are leased to Hainan Airlines and 3 are leased to Qatar Airways. Of the 3 leased frames to Qatar Airways, 2 will be returned to LATAM in 2020 and 1 in 2021." source: airliners.net Thanks for that. Are the earlier frames ( A7-AMA and AMB ) in LATAM livery as A7-AQA is ? From memory the Hainan frames are in their livery. Geoff yes they are |
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Mar 13, 2019 19:30:52 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Mar 21, 2019 18:59:57 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Mar 21, 2019 22:05:41 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by savoyard74 on Mar 21, 2019 22:29:17 GMT 1
In the air and leaving TLS |
|
|
|
Post by addasih on Mar 21, 2019 22:58:53 GMT 1
Where should move the thread to QA or JJ delivered section?
|
|
|
|
Post by ca350 on Mar 21, 2019 23:06:45 GMT 1
Where should move the thread to QA or JJ delivered section? Personally, I felt like Latam works better since they are owned by latam, and in prior case we put MSN 64 and MSN 79 under Latam. However, we put MSN 226 and MSN 245 under Hainan rather than Latam, so 🤷🏽♀️ |
|
|
|
Post by FabienA380 on Mar 22, 2019 8:07:53 GMT 1
I would leave it under JJ indeed....
|
|
sciing
in service - 1 year
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,503 
|
Post by sciing on Mar 22, 2019 8:35:03 GMT 1
Where should move the thread to QA or JJ delivered section? Personally, I felt like Latam works better since they are owned by latam, and in prior case we put MSN 64 and MSN 79 under Latam. However, we put MSN 226 and MSN 245 under Hainan rather than Latam, so 🤷🏽♀️ One criteria could be dry lease (put it to the lessee) vs. wet lease (put it under the lessor). Another one simply the color scheme or you wait for Aurbus OD. MSN 265 seems to a be dry lease, operated by Qatar. |
|
philidor
in service - 6 years
Posts: 8,950
|
Post by philidor on Mar 23, 2019 13:20:45 GMT 1
One criteria could be dry lease (put it to the lessee) vs. wet lease (put it under the lessor). Another one simply the color scheme or you wait for Aurbus OD. MSN 265 seems to a be dry lease, operated by Qatar. We recently had an unconclusive discussion on this topic. I like Sciing's criteria. In this case, both the paint scheme and the nature of the lease agreement (dry and short-term) dictate that the frame be considered as part of the LATAM fleet. |
|
